Pine and Pico Article
bradleyb at u.washington.edu
Wed Jul 4 11:43:11 PDT 2001
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 09:27:15PM -0700, Tony Cota wrote:
> At 3:33 PM -0700 7/3/01, Lawrence Lin wrote:
> >"The University of Washington's Pine mailer. A popular piece of software,
> >indeed, as is its editor component, Pico. So much so that most people turn a
> >blind eye to its license: a license, I feel, that is as bad as anything that
> >has ever come out of Redmond."
> It was a nice piece of anti-Pine FUD. I didn't think it was a great
> article. The Pine license, IMHO, is just not that big a deal. I wrote
> the author though, and expressed a few criticisms of his article. If
> you want, I'll post them with his reply, if I get one.
it's bad enough to keep debian from distributing binaries. you have to
compile it yourself.
More information about the Linux